[Skyeye-developer] SVN Trunk - How to get all architectures?
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Fri Feb 1 01:05:24 CST 2008
Michael.Kang wrote:
> Run skyeye -h should print all the architecture supported by SkyEye.
> But this feature is also in development. That means some supported
> machine are not printed. We will complete this feature later.
>
> Now SkyEye-1.2.4 support the following arch( In most of simulated
> machines, uClinux or linux can run on them):
> arm:
> lh79520 lpc2210 ns9750 ps7500 pxa250 pxa270 s3c2410x
> s3c2440 at91 s3c3410x at91rm92 s3c44b0x cs89712
> s3c4510b ep7312 sa1100 ep9312.c sharp ep9315
>
Hmmm.. unrelated question. I have been looking at
this board (Olimex):
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8208
Do you have a skyeye.conf to match it? How well does
it work?
> blackfin:
> bf533 bf537
> coldfire:
> cf5249 cf5272
> ppc:
> mpc8560
> mips:
> au1100(not complete.)
>
Thanks. I was actually trying to run the RTEMS MIPS CSB350
BSP which I thought ran in the past. It uses this configuration:
cpu: mips
mach: au1100
mem_bank: map=M, type=RW, addr=0x20100000, size=0x00F00000
mem_bank: map=M, type=RW, addr=0x00200000, size=0x0004000
log: logon=1, logfile=/tmp/sk1.log, start=2000000, end=3000000
=========================================
bash-3.2$ ~/skyeye/skyeye-svn/binary/skyeye -c ~/skyeye/csb350.conf -e
$B8/ticker*/mips-csb350-ticker.exe
big_endian is true.
arch: arm
Error: Unkonw cpu name "mips"
Error: Unkonw cpu name "mips"
"cpu" option parameter error!
Error: Unkonw mach name "au1100"
Error: Unkonw mach name "au1100"
"mach" option parameter error!
=========================================
FWIW "Unkonw" should be "Unknown" :-D
> Some machine simulation may be broken in the current source
> repository. The machines that are included by skyeye testsuite are
> more stable .
>
>
OK.
> --Thanks
> -- MK
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 11:22 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was doing some spot checking of RTEMS against the
>> SVN Trunk and noticed that "make NO_BFD=1" produced
>> a skyeye binary with only ARM support. I didn't
>> see anything obvious in the Makefile or README.
>>
>> Have I missed some change?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> --joel sherrill
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CLinux.org Websites:
>> http://seohelper.cn/
>> http://www.implight.net/
>> http://gro.clinux.org/
>> Skyeye-developer mailing list
>> Skyeye-developer at lists.gro.clinux.org
>> http://lists.gro.clinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skyeye-developer
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> www.skyeye.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> CLinux.org Websites:
> http://seohelper.cn/
> http://www.implight.net/
> http://gro.clinux.org/
> Skyeye-developer mailing list
> Skyeye-developer at lists.gro.clinux.org
> http://lists.gro.clinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skyeye-developer
>
More information about the Skyeye-developer
mailing list