[Skyeye-developer] [ARGUMENT] ppc simulation from PearPC ?

[Yonghao Wang]

On 28/07/07, Michael. Kang <blackfin.kang at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Anthony Lee <don.anthony.lee at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Should we notice people something of SkyEye's ppc simulation
> > brought by(yanked from) other projects like PearPC etc. by writing
> > something to README or COPYRIGHT of source tarball in order to
> > abide by GPL or GPL2 license ?
> That is very necessary for SkyEye. I missed it in a long time , and
> now I add some statement for those sourc code from other project in
> LICENSE file. Since those source code also was originally released
> under GPL or GPL2,  we can refer them in our SkyEye. At the same time,
> we need to reserve its copyright statement in somewhere or the header
> of source code.

I totally agree with you too. Copyright needs to be checked and
audited, and we need to keep original header as is. GPLed / Royalty
free code doesn't mean no copyright. Hence make skyeye strict
legitimated.

> >
> > And maybe coldfire simulation has the same question.
> >
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Skyeye-developer mailing list
> > Skyeye-developer at lists.gro.clinux.org
> > http://lists.gro.clinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skyeye-developer
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> www.skyeye.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Skyeye-developer mailing list
> Skyeye-developer at lists.gro.clinux.org
> http://lists.gro.clinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skyeye-developer
>