[Skyeye-developer] SkyEye 1.2.3 with NIC SKYEYE NE2K can't communicat by ping command

[Michael.Kang]

          Thanks a lot for your effort. That is a big help for SkyEye.
          I had ever tried skyeyene2k dirver with uClinux-dist-2004
and uClinux-dist-2007 version on SkyEye-1.2.3 , got no luck . I guess
probably the older version of SkyEye(0.9.8 or 0.7.4 etc.) can run it
normally.  So now there has no netcard driver source of 8019 that can
build and run on SkyEye sucessfully. Though 8019 driver in
testcase-2.2 can run correctly on SkyEye, but now its source is not
available due to not maintained in some days.  We will try to release
new netcard source for 8019 that can build and run on SkyEye in the
following version. If someone can solve it, that is really helpful for
SyEye.

-- Thanks
-- Michael.Kang

On 7/27/07, undefined <undefined at 163.com> wrote:
> skyeye-developer
>
> I met the same error like the mail before mentioned
> [Skyeye-developer] SkyEye NIC does not work in my kernel
> Stanislav Meduna stano at meduna.org
> Sun Jul 8 16:44:13 CST 2007
>
> I use  skyeye 1.2.3 ,compiled uClinux-dist-20030522 in gcc 3.4.4 ,have tap0 up in linux redhat9.0,
> In linux
> I get
>   PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
> uclinux
> />ifconfig
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:04:03:02:01:0F
>           inet addr:10.0.0.2  Bcast:10.255.255.255  Mask:255.0.0.0
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 iB)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 iB)
>           Interrupt:16
>
> but use skyeye 0.7.4+same img+conf file,I can ping normally!!!!
>
>
> I found many people in bbs have the same error by google,so I do some test, use two image and three version of skyeye.  skyeye.conf is same in testsuit2/at91/uclinux_rtl8019
>
> skyeye          use my compiled uclinux romfs.img  testsuit2-examples,at91 uclinux_rtl8019
>                      uClinux-dist-20030522
>
>                      found NIC?   ping ok?            found NIC?   ping  ok?
> 0.7.4                SKYEYE NE2K  yes                 not found    error
> 1.2.2                SKYEYE NE2K  no                  NE1000       no
> 1.2.3                SKYEYE NE2K  no                  NE2000       yes
>
> why this happen?
> =======================================================================
> The mail I found in mail list mentioned the same situation.
>
> [Skyeye-developer] SkyEye NIC does not work in my kernel
> Stanislav Meduna stano at meduna.org
> Sun Jul 8 16:44:13 CST 2007
>
> Previous message: [Skyeye-developer] Fwd: SF.net SVN: skyeye: [269] skyeye-v1/trunk/arch/mips
> Next message: [Skyeye-developer] SkyEye NIC does not work in my kernel
> Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to get the uClinux 20070130 running on skyeye 1.2.3
> inclusive networking working. I got to the point where
> the kernel boots and the basic applications work,
> I have the tap0 interface, the kernel sees the uClinux's
> SkyEye NE2k 'card', but there is no communication.
> All I get is
>   PING 10.0.0.2 (10.0.0.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
>   From 10.0.0.1 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
>
> I tried the testsuite and the networking works - but
> there is no SkyEye NE2k, but the 'normal' one. SkyEye
> is the same, as is the skyeye.conf. I even tried
> to compile a generic NE2k driver instead of
> SkyEye's, no difference.
>
> So the problem is in my kernel. How can I find the exact
> kernel configuration of the kernel used in the
> skyeye-testsuite-2.2/uClinux/at91/uclinux_rtl8019,
> so I can compare them? Are there any debugging
> possibilities in the sene2k and/or SkyEye
> to check what part of the communication does
> not work?
>
>
>
>
> undefined
> 　　　　　　　　undefined at 163.com
> 2007-07-27
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Skyeye-developer mailing list
> Skyeye-developer at lists.gro.clinux.org
> http://lists.gro.clinux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/skyeye-developer
>
>


-- 
www.skyeye.org